Genealogists get very excited when we are able to extend our
ancestral lines back another generation. I know I sure do. What should we feel
if our paternal line got extended thousands of generations further back in time?
That is what is about to happen for all of us.
“Y-chromosome Adam” just got a much earlier birthday. New
research soon to be submitted for publication will claim that “Y-chromosome
Adam” lived much earlier than had been established by earlier research. Until now the scientific community has told
the human story with “Mitochondrial Eve” living much earlier than “Y-chromosome
Adam”. If you have followed the creation story, you may wonder how that is
possible. Didn't “Adam” and “Eve” have to live at the same time? The new
research suggests “Y-chromosome Adam” lived thousands of generations earlier than we were
led to believe just a year ago. This could make him earlier than “Mitochondrial
Eve”.
Actually, both “Mitochondrial Eve” and “Y-chromosome Adam”
lived later than the Biblical Adam and Eve. Mitochondrial Eve is the mythical
woman who is a place holder for the earliest woman who had at least two
daughters who have an unbroken line of female descendants who have preserved
and passed along her mitochondrial DNA down to currently living offspring. In
like manner, Y-chromosome Adam is the mythical male placeholder who had at
least two sons who have an unbroken line of male descendants who have preserved
and passed along his Y-chromosome DNA down to currently living offspring.
This discovery was first investigated by Bonnie Schrack, a
volunteer DNA project administrator and “citizen scientist”. She was trying to
place a member of her project into the appropriate haplogroup. When he didn’t
seem to fit any of the existing groups, she turned to Thomas Krahn, Technical
Laboratory Manager for Family Tree DNA (FTDNA) and Dr. Michael Hammer of the
University of Arizona for assistance. A paper outlining their findings is in
the final stages of preparation and is expected to be published early next
year.
Those of us attending the 8th International
Conference on Genetic Genealogy in Houston this past weekend got an advance
peek at their results and early reactions show great excitement:
Matty K , in response to a Dienekes blog post said: “Sounds
like one of those "everything you know is wrong" discoveries.”
". . . it's hard to realize you're living history while
it happens . . . . "
- quote from private email from Ann P. Turner to Georgia Kinney-Bopp.
- quote from private email from Ann P. Turner to Georgia Kinney-Bopp.
Is it really that monumental? We will have to wait for the reaction of the scientific community to the publication of the paper in early 2013.
Thanks for the interesting update from the conference. Bonnie's surname is in fact Schrack not Strack.
ReplyDeleteOops! Thanks Debbie, I'm happy to correct my error. I just downloaded your Surnames Handbook last night and am reading it.
Delete